There are numerous different microservices are available like Flask, Django, tornado, pyramid, etc. But Flask is different than all others. Its increasing demand and best features enhance its possibility of using it as a microservice architecture.
Before we begin the blog let’s talk about us so that you could know from whom you get these trustable insights. We are a bunch of expert developers who have different expertise over different computer languages. We love coding and especially Python. So that we provide different Python application development services among some other services like a website, mobile android app, building, etc. To get to know more about us click here.
The Flask almost wins when it comes to choosing a Microservice framework. But how does he do that? It’s because of its features like big and growing community, flexibility, easily build a prototype, lots of resources, minimalist without losing power, etc. these are very handful features that one needs to use any microservice architecture.
Here are the comparisons so that you get a better idea about the benefits and features of the flask that makes it unique compared to other microservice frameworks.
One of the most popular comparisons that you would see on the Internet right now. And when you develop any stuff on the microservice framework, you probably face loads of back on forth between them. But why is that?
Because both are almost the same when you compare. Both are Python-based frameworks Both are highly performant. When it comes to durability both get the same numbers.
Django has a big community of developers. So, that is one difference but Flask is also growing fast than ever. So, This would be a pro for both. Now, the Flask wins when it comes to packages Like Flask has minimalistic packages without any restrictions. So one can implement exactly what he wants. Besides, Flask also offers to let you use external libraries If you want to use them.
Although, Almost everything depends on the project that you are working on when it comes to choosing any framework. But we often recommend you to go with Flask unless the project is very small. If that would be the case, go with the bottle.
Here, a clear win is Flask. Because It can offer any sorts of functionalities that you need and also have a bigger community compare to Bottle. Although, Bottle did any project very fast It is not true when it comes to big scale projects.
CherryPy is another framework on which you may dive into a dilemma while choosing a microservice framework. There are equally similarities and dissimilarities in both of these. While CherryPy is on the 8th number on the list of microservices Flask rank 4th. Loads of factors support Flask over CherryPy. Some of them are given below:
There are two main differences when we compare flask to the Web2py.
The first is Documentations: Flask could provide easy and constructive documentation as compared to Web2py. Now, Web2py also has features but if you use that you need to be very careful otherwise there are chances that you lack somewhere in the project.
The second most important difference is to use ORM. If you really want to use SQL within the Flask then this feature would definitely use through the ORM feature. It emerges as true SQL for the Flask. On the other side, Web2py does not have this feature. although you can build it through the support of other features.
These are 4 major comparisons on which you can say that Flask has loads of features that make developers work easier and faster. That’s why the developers have this rule of using flask whenever they could use it as a microservice architecture. Almost every side of the flask’s easiness and handy useful features give developers immense easiness. That is the reason for its uniqueness and also of its popularity.
So, That’s it from our side. We at 9series are known for providing best app development consulting in new York. Build your business application today, contact us for free price quotation.